Decision dated October 30, 2014 No. 5-522 / 2014 Official Nurgaleev, being the head of Oasis LLC, did not timely submit a tax return for the simplified tax system to the interdistrict IFTS of Russia for the Republic of Belarus

Decision of October 30, 2014 No. 5-522/2014

The official Nurgaleev, being the head of Oasis LLC, did not timely submit to the interdistrict IFTS of Russia for the Republic of Belarus a tax return for the simplified tax system for 2013. When the deadline for submission is no later than the declaration submitted, which violated paragraph 2 of Art. 346.23 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation.

At the hearing, the official Nurgaleev repented of his deed.

Magistrate, having studied and evaluated the evidence presented in accordance with the requirements of Article. 26.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation, having comprehensively and fully examined the circumstances of the case in their entirety, concludes that the fault of the official Nurgaleev in committing an administrative offense under Art. 15.5 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation is confirmed:

– a statement on the involvement of an official Nurgaleev E.R. to administrative responsibility

– a protocol on an administrative offense from the city;

– a copy of the notice of the place and time of drawing up a protocol on an administrative offense dated

– a copy of the notice of the postal item;

– an extract from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities of Oasis LLC dated

Thus, the justice of the peace considers that the administrative offense provided for by Article 15.5 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation – violation of the deadlines established by the legislation on taxes and fees for submitting a tax return to the tax authority at the place of registration, was established in the actions of the official Nurgaleev.

The circumstance mitigating the administrative responsibility of the official Nurgaleev is the repentance of the person who committed the administrative offense, the presence of dependent minor children.

There are no circumstances aggravating Nurgaleev's administrative responsibility in the case file.

When imposing an administrative penalty, the justice of the peace takes into account the personality of the offender, the nature of the administrative offense committed, and the circumstances mitigating administrative responsibility.

Based on Art. Art. 29.9, 29.10 Administrative Code of the Russian Federation, magistrate

Official Nurglaeeva guilty of an administrative offense under Art. 15.5 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation and subject to administrative punishment in the form of an administrative fine in the amount of 300 (three hundred) RUB.

Details for paying the fine:

Beneficiary bank: GRCC NB RB Bank of Russia

Recipient: UFK MF RF for the Republic of Belarus (MRI FTS of Russia for the Republic of Belarus)

Administrative fine 18211603030016000140

Explain that in accordance with Art. 32.2 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation, an administrative fine must be paid, and a copy of the document confirming the payment of the fine must be submitted to the judge who issued the decision no later than sixty days from the date the decision to impose an administrative fine enters into force.

According to Art.20.25 to the AP of the Russian Federation, the non -payment of an administrative fine within the specified period entails the imposition of an administrative fine in a two -time amount of the amount of an unpaid administrative fine, but not less than one thousand rubles, or administrative arrest for up to fifteen days, or mandatory work for up to fifty hours.

The decision can be appealed for ten days to the district court of the Republic of Bashkortostan.

Justice of the magistrate signature

368 documents with an identical number were found

In our database there are other documents under the number 5-522/2014. Perhaps you were looking for one of them. Check out the list below.

Judicial plot No. 3 for Tuymazy and Tuimazinsky district of the Republic of Bashkortostan

Decision of October 30, 2014 No. 5-518/2014

Decision of October 30, 2014 No. 5-519/2014

Decision of October 30, 2014 No. 5-522/2014

Decision of October 30, 2014 No. 5-490/2014

Decision of October 28, 2014 No. 5-495/2014

Decision of October 28, 2014 No. 5-497/2014

Decision of October 28, 2014 No. 5-559/2014

Decision of October 28, 2014 No. 5-558/2014

Decision of October 27, 2014 No. 2-1104/2014

Decision of October 27, 2014 No. 2-1102/2014

Helpful information

Judicial system of the Russian Federation

How is justice in the Russian Federation carried out? A small guide for the construction of the judiciary in our country.

Request the court’s decision: the sequence of actions

The court issued a verdict, and you need to get its firm copy on hand. How to do it? We understand the question.

How to appeal the court decision? Practical recommendations

The court decision can be challenged in higher instance. We find out how to do it right.

about the project

Laws. Online – database of archives of decisions of courts of all instances of the Russian Federation. All documents are provided in the public domain and at free.